Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 462-466.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.06.011

所属专题: GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测技术相关研究

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

Xpert Mtb/RIF检测技术在结核病诊断中的应用评价

赵冰 欧喜超 夏辉 李强 逄宇 张治英 董海燕 李俊晨 章建康 池俊英 赵雁林   

  1. 102206 北京,中国疾病预防控制中心结核病预防控制中心 国家结核病参比实验室(赵冰、欧喜超、夏辉、李强、逄宇、赵雁林);帕斯适宜卫生科技组织(张治英、董海燕、李俊晨、章建康);中国国家卫生和计划生育委员会与比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会结核病防治项目办(池俊英)
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-06 出版日期:2014-06-10 发布日期:2014-06-28
  • 通信作者: 赵雁林 E-mail:zhaoyanlin@chinatb.org
  • 基金资助:

    中国国家卫生和计划生育委员会与比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会结核病防治项目(2009-04-01)

Application and evaluation of Xpert Mtb/RIF detection assay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis

ZHAO Bing, OU Xi-chao, XIA Hui, LI Qiang, PANG Yu, ZHANG Zhi-ying, DONG Hai-yan, LI Jun-chen, ZHANG Jian-kang, CHI Jun-ying, ZHAO Yan-lin   

  1. National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, National Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2014-04-06 Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-28
  • Contact: ZHAO Yan-lin E-mail:zhaoyanlin@chinatb.org

摘要: 目的 评估Xpert Mtb/RIF检测技术快速诊断肺结核及利福平耐药的可靠性。 方法  在4个县(区)级结核病防治机构(湘潭县、岳阳县、绥化市北林区和兰西县),门诊医生连续纳入2142例初诊肺结核可疑患者,每例患者留取3份痰标本,实验室工作人员对每份标本同时进行涂片镜检、固体培养和Xpert Mtb/RIF(利福平耐药实时荧光定量核酸扩增检测技术)检测,临床医生2个月末对患者完成随访。省级参比实验室对555例培养阳性患者完成比例法利福平药敏试验,国家参比实验室对传统药敏试验和Xpert Mtb/RIF检测结果不一致菌株进行rpoB耐药基因核心区间测序。以随访后临床诊断结果为金标准,比较涂片镜检、固体培养和Xpert Mtb/RIF检测结核分枝杆菌的敏感度。以传统药敏试验结果为金标准,分析Xpert Mtb/RIF检测利福平耐药的效能。 结果  以临床诊断结果为金标准,涂片镜检、固体培养和Xpert Mtb/RIF检测结核分枝杆菌的敏感度分别为25.68%(284/1106)、51.44%(555/1079)和58.82%(650/1105),Xpert Mtb/RIF检测敏感度高于涂片镜检(χ2=360.10, P<0.05)和固体培养试验(χ2=50.13, P<0.05)。以传统药敏试验结果为金标准,Xpert Mtb/RIF检测利福平耐药的敏感度和特异度分别为87.10%(27/31)和97.95%(477/487)。  结论 Xpert Mtb/RIF检测操作简单,检测敏感度高于涂片镜检和固体培养,同时可以诊断患者是否对利福平耐药,在我国县(区)级实验室具有非常好的应用前景。

关键词: 结核, 肺/诊断, 利福平, 抗药性, 细菌, 核酸扩增技术

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the application value of Xpert Mtb/RIF detection assay in the diagnoses of tuberculosis (TB) and Rifampin resistance. Methods Clinicians continuously recruited 2142 TB suspects in four counties (districts) level TB dispensary (Xiangtan, Yueyang, Beilin, Lanxi). Three sputum specimens each patient provided were performed smear, solid culture and Xpert Mtb/RIF test. The TB patients with definite diagnoses were followed up for two months. The staff in provincial laboratory completed rifampin susceptibility test in 555 culture-positive strains using proportional method. The staff in national reference laboratory sequenced the rifampin-resistant determinant region of rpoB genes in the strains with the inconsistent results between Xpert Mtb/RIF and traditional drug susceptibility test. Using clinical diagnosis as gold standard, the performance of smear, solid culture and Mtb/RIF test were evaluated. The performance of Xpert Mtb/RIF for rifampin resistance detection was compared with traditional drug susceptibility test.   Results Using clinical diagnosis result as the gold standard, the sensitivities of smear, solid culture and Xpert Mtb/RIF were 25.68%(284/1106), 51.44%(555/1079) and 58.82%(650/1105), respectively. The sensitivity of Xpert Mtb/RIF was higher than smear (χ2=360.10, P<0.05) and the solid culture(χ2=50.13, P<0.05). Compared with traditional drug susceptibility test, the sensitivity and the specificity of Xpert Mtb/RIF for rifampin resistance detection were 87.10% (27/31) and 97.95% (477/487), respectively. Conclusion Xpert Mtb/RIF test is simple, the sensitivity of Xpert Mtb/RIF is higher than smear microscopy and solid culture,it can also diagnose patients of rifampin resistance, so it has very good application prospects in our county (district) level laboratories.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary/diagnosis, Rifampin, Drug resistance, bacterial, Nucleic acid amplification techniques